e02b018.pdf
(
128 KB
)
Pobierz
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
GENERAL
INTEREST
Everything you always wanted to know about
Speed Cameras
but were afraid to ask…
By: B. Bouchez
Feared by many motorists (let those who have never driven too fast cast
the first stone), the speed camera, usually containing a radar, is an
electronic device whose workings are still a mystery to most electronics
hobbyists. In this article we take the covers of these curious devices and
describe their operation in detail, also considering a few ideas to guard
against their actions.
them will be reflected back to the
transmitter, where an aerial can
detect them.
In the original systems the start of
the horizontal sweep in the cathode-
ray tube was synchronised with the
transmission of the signal burst and
the return signal received by the aer-
ial was fed to the vertical deflection
amplifier. When the aerial received a
return signal (the waves reflected
back by an object) a spike could be
seen further to the right of the tube,
the position depending on the dis-
tance of the object (see
Figure 1
).
This system could not only be
used to detect the presence of every
object (aeroplane) that was in its
field of ‘view’, but it could also deter-
mine the distance accurately
between the aerial and the object,
since the propagation speed of the
waves and the rate of horizontal
deflection (time base) were known.
This is how R.A.D.A.R. came about,
an acronym that soon turned into an
everyday word.
Subsequently the radar was
improved to cover all of the sur-
rounding area rather than just a
small section directly in front of the
aerial. This was done by mounting
(Source: Applied Concepts, Inc. / Stalker Radar)
A little bit of history
Many, many years ago, the investigations car-
ried out on electromagnetic radiation in the
thirties revealed that RF waves appeared to
be reflected back from some objects. This
property became more discernible as the fre-
quency was increased (above 100 MHz). It
wasn’t until the end of the thirties that SHF (f
>1GHz) waves could be generated easily,
thanks to the introduction of the
magnetron
(which is still used in modern
microwave ovens).
The first practical application of
this system was for
Radio Detection
And Ranging,
better known as its
acronym RADAR. The operation of
radar is based on the transmission of
a series of SHF waves at regular
intervals. When these waves hit an
object of sufficient mass then part of
18
Elektor Electronics
11/2002
GENERAL
INTEREST
the aerial assembly on top of a
turntable (the cathode-ray tubes
were now given deflections in two
directions).
TX/RX antenna
controlled
SHF
oscillator
switch
Introducing the Doppler
effect
The device just described is not
capable of determining the speed of
the detected object; this was limited
to measuring the movement of the
echo on the screen, which gave a
rather inaccurate result.
As an example, consider a car
that makes a sound with a fixed fre-
quency (a car that is driven with
fixed revs for example). When you
are in the car you won’t notice any
variation in the frequency of the
engine sound.
If however you stand at the side
of the road and listen to the car
when it drives past under identical
conditions you will notice that the
frequency of the engine sound
increases as the car comes nearer
and then decreases as the car trav-
els past you. (This effect is also
noticeable in F1 Grand Prix races
when the cars roar past the camera.)
This phenomenon works the other
way round as well: when you drive
your car past somebody who is
shouting on the pavement, you
should notice that the frequency of
the shouting increases as you go
towards the person, and then
decreases as you move away.
When the distance between the
sound source and the receiver
remains constant then the frequency
of the received signal won’t vary
either.
The Doppler effect (named after
the physicist who discovered it) is
nothing more than that described by
the formula in
Figure 2
:
return
signal
amplifier
frequency
generator
vertical
amplifier
transmitted
burst
synchronised
sawtooth
generator
received
burst
horizontal
amplifier
020165 - 11
Figure 1: Principle of operation of first generation radars (1940).
nal in air (300,000 km/s for radio
waves, 340 m/s for sound
waves).
From this we can deduce that
sending a fixed frequency signal
towards the car and then measuring
the frequency of the returning signal
will give you the speed of a car.
This is the principle used for
radars in speed cameras, although
they have little in common with the
systems described in the first part of
this article.
It should be mentioned that the
sensitivity of the radar increases as
the angle between the beam and the
path of the vehicle decreases. For
this reason the aerials of speed cam-
eras are positioned parallel to the
roads rather than across them! This
is also the reason why few types of
radar can work along bends, since
the angle between the beam and the
vehicle continually changes, creating
errors in the measurements.
sure the speed of vehicles, we’ll take a look
at the commercial applications that are found
at the side of the road.
The basis of every speed camera (let’s call
it a radar) is a SHF generator, which can
transmit a beam in a specific direction. From
the previous section we have learnt that the
sensitivity of the device is directly propor-
tional to the frequency of the beam. The exact
frequency used depends on the manufacturer,
but is generally between 2 GHz and 15 GHz.
The device can either have a SHF oscillator
based on a Gunn diode and a resonant cav-
ity, or a transistor oscillator followed by a
power amplifier. The power of these oscilla-
tors is not very high (usually less than 10
mW), but the effective power output is
increased through the use of a directional aer-
ial.
The receiver for the reflected signal is
often based on a Schottky diode, situated at
the focal point of the aerial (usually the same
aerial is used for transmission and reception),
which functions as a mixer of the transmitted
and reflected signals.
The output signal of the receiver is ampli-
fied, conditioned by an analogue circuit and
then passed on to the measurement section,
which is nothing more than a frequency
counter.
From theory to practice!
Now that we’ve seen how the
Doppler effect can be used to mea-
f
M
= 2
vf
E
cos (α
/
c
)
where
f
M
is the frequency of the received
signal.
v is the speed of the vehicle.
f
E
is the frequency of the transmitted
signal.
α is the angle between the transmit-
ter and the path along which the
vehicle travels.
c
is the propagation speed of the sig-
direction of vehicle M
M
f
E
V
Speed check
TX/RX
f
M
020165 - 12
Figure 2: The Doppler effect.
11/2002
Elektor Electronics
19
GENERAL
INTEREST
The signal from the frequency counter
goes to a microprocessor that calculates the
speed and sends it to a display. It also checks
if the measured speed exceeds a preset value
and warns the police officers who are nearby
that an offender has just passed, or it acti-
vates a camera and flashgun.
In short, the basic principles behind a high
frequency speed detector (
Figure 3
) are not
very complex. (Note that we’re talking about
the principles, a practical implementation is
something else altogether, especially the high
frequency section.)
take measurements up to twenty
meters, the newer models with their
ultra-sensitive detectors are capable
of taking measurements over several
hundred meters, so well before they
can be seen from the car!
surement. Actual radar equipment
works on a random basis or is acti-
vated only when a vehicle comes
nearby.
Discrimination
: when several vehi-
cles travelling at different speeds
encounter a radar beam, the result-
ing Doppler signal contains a mix-
ture of signals at different frequen-
cies. The majority of current devices
can’t separate these components
and reject the measurement as
faulty. There are however newer sys-
tems that contain a DSP (the author
has worked on one of these sys-
tems), which can measure the speed
of several cars simultaneously. So
now only those cars that happen to
be in the ‘shadow’ of others can
escape the speed cameras.
The long and short of it is that
speed cameras have become so
accurate and reliable (which can be
confirmed by drivers who don’t keep
to the speed limit), that it has
become extremely difficult to evade
them!
Reaction time
: just as with any other
equipment that use frequency coun-
ters, these speed cameras also
require a certain time to take a mea-
surement. Furthermore, most
devices now take several measure-
ments rapidly, making it possible to
reject any possibly erroneous mea-
surements. Older models required
about half a second to take a reliable
measurement. Current models react
within a tenth of a second, so any
motorist who ignores the speed limit
will have very little chance of avoid-
ing a fine after noticing a speed
camera. Sometimes the radar equip-
ment also contains a DSP (Digital
Signal Processor), which uses a spe-
cial algorithm with a very short pull-
in time, making extremely fast read-
ings possible.
How well does it work?
Now that we know how it all works we may
wonder how reliable the measurements made
by these devices are. Let’s keep one thing
clear: we have no intention of encouraging
any of our readers to break the speed limit or
behave irresponsibly. We just want to look at
the problem from a technical viewpoint to dis-
cover what the limits are of SHF speed cam-
eras. In this way we can distinguish between
proven facts and ‘rumours’ that are doing the
rounds, made by people with little knowledge
of electronics. Instead of straying into difficult
technical considerations we’ll just answer the
most common questions.
Continuous transmission
: in contrast
to what you may have thought after
reading the theoretical part of this
article, a radar does not need to have
its oscillator functioning continu-
ously. It only needs to be active long
enough to stabilise and take a mea-
On the wrong side
of the law
Mankind, and especially homo auto-
mobilis, behaves in such a way that
when he comes across an obstacle
he will try everything to get round
Operation during rain or mist:
in contrast to
widespread opinion, radar works perfectly
well during rain or mist (after all, radar is
used extensively to help with the landing of
aeroplanes in bad weather!). In general,
when it rains it comes down vertically (at
least it does here!), which is at right angles
to the radar beam, bringing about a Doppler
effect of zero (cos 90° = 0, so
f
M
= 0). Heavy
rain that comes down at an angle due to
strong gusts of wind can affect the signal-to-
noise ratio of the receiver and prevent its cor-
rect operation. In this case the processor will
simply reject the measurements.
Since mist doesn’t move with respect to
the radar beam (or only very slowly) it will be
practically invisible to the receiver and the
measurements are completely unaffected.
Measurement range
: the distance from which
a radar can measure the speed of a vehicle
depends on two factors: the power of the SHF
oscillator and the sensitivity of the detector.
We already knew that the oscillator power is
generally low and that the use of a directional
aerial increased the transmitted power. The
biggest problem for the detector is the signal-
to-noise ratio, which doesn’t get any better
with Schottky diodes. In this section the sen-
sitivity can also be improved through the use
of aerials. Whilst the first radars could only
20
Elektor Electronics
11/2002
GENERAL
INTEREST
it. Speed cameras are no exception
to this, and numerous boffins
(whether competent or not) have
contributed to the development of
counter measures.
Before we continue we would like
to make one thing perfectly clear: in
the majority of European countries
the possession, and even more so,
the
use
of equipment intended to
disrupt the operation of speed cam-
eras is illegal. Indifference in this
area is not recommended, since the
consequences can be dire (handing
in of the driver’s licence, confiscation
of the vehicle, prosecutions, etc.).
In spite of this, some drivers think
it is worth the risk and don’t shrink
back from using these devices.
Loosely speaking, there are two
types of ‘anti-radars`: jamming
devices and detectors.
The jamming devices are simply
small SHF oscillators, which are
used to send a ‘fake’ signal back to
the speed camera, causing the mea-
surement to fail and preventing the
logical analysis of the frequency.
Besides the fact that these devices
are relatively ineffective (in most
radars the circuits are less sensitive
to interference signals: the frequency
of the jamming signal therefore has
to be as close as possible to that of
the speed camera, and every device
has its own frequency), the elec-
tronic circuits in the radar can detect
such jamming signals and notify the
police. A jamming device is therefore
a sure-fire way to get caught!
A detector on the other hand con-
sists of a simple SHF receiver, and
by definition these can’t be
detected. In the USA (where their
use is permitted) they are sold in
large quantities. On the Internet
they are readily available and in
some European countries they are
also freely available (their sale is
permitted but their use isn’t!). These
are usually relatively simple circuits
containing a microwave detector
and a comparator that drives an
alarm. In short, simplicity itself
(although their price seems to sug-
gest the opposite is true!).
TX/RX
parabolic antenna
SHF
oscillator
(2 – 10 GHz)
Receiver/mixer
command
processor
amplifier/
shaper
analyser
display
020165 - 13
Figure 3: Basic principle of a high-frequency speed camera.
oscillator of a speed camera is set to
a frequency that is outside the range
covered by the detector, or it uses an
optical laser, then you’re bound to
get caught.
The second problem is that in
order to detect something, there first
has to be something to detect (obvi-
ous, isn’t it?). Older radar equipment
transmitted continuously, which
made the task simpler, but newer
models only transmit intermittently,
either randomly or in short bursts,
reducing the chance of detecting
these devices. Some models (such as
the Mesta 208 sold in France where
the author lives) are even more cun-
ning and only come into action when
a car comes within their range.
These ‘green bullets’, as they are
known because of their shape and
colour, have an optical detector on
top that literally sees the vehicles
coming.
As soon as there is some move-
ment in front of the device it springs
into action.
This brings us to the third prob-
lem: a radar detector will sense the
beam at that instant. But at the
same time the speed camera is
already doing its work. From this it
follows that in the time taken by the
driver (a typical reaction time for
people is about half a second) to
take appropriate action (to brake or
disrupt the measurement), the radar
will already have taken four or five
measurements.
The detection is made more diffi-
cult by the fact that very narrow beams are
used, making for a small ‘detection area’.
Some users of radar detectors have noticed
that the beam can also be detected when it
is reflected off other cars ahead and have
gladly made use of this property.
And now for the final problem: most radar
equipment can take measurements of
approaching (from the front) or receding (from
the rear) vehicles. But the sensitivity of most
detectors is limited to just one direction. To
be prepared for any eventuality the vehicle
should therefore have a detector at both the
front and rear!
And finally...
As the saying goes, if you play with fire you
may get burned. As we have seen in this arti-
cle, speed cameras have become reliable
instruments that are difficult to locate or
interfere with.
Knowing how to detect a SHF beam is one
thing; to disrupt a speed measurement is
another story. In short, although most in-car
radar detectors sold at the moment do work
and show the presence of speed cameras,
they are of little use because the speed cam-
era is likely to be triggered
before
the driver
can slow down.
Even though speed cameras are some-
times situated in places where they aren’t
justified (which has given rise to the name
‘euro-pump` on the continent), in our opin-
ion it shows more sense to respect the speed
limits (also out of respect for other road
users), rather than attempt to get round the
law at all costs.
It isn’t difficult to design a broad-
band detector that reacts to fre-
quencies between 2 and 10 GHz,
which is the range where most mod-
ern devices operate. However, if the
(020165-1)
11/2002
Elektor Electronics
21
Plik z chomika:
gasma
Inne pliki z tego folderu:
bge.jpg
(23 KB)
detail1.htm
(4 KB)
detail2.htm
(4 KB)
e02a016.pdf
(1746 KB)
detail3.htm
(5 KB)
Inne foldery tego chomika:
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
Zgłoś jeśli
naruszono regulamin